The Supreme Court ruled today in two cases that could have a major impact on how social media platforms operate and how the government can interfere on behalf of political speech on these platforms.

The Supreme Court expressed strong concerns on Monday about the sweep of state laws restricting how large social media companies moderate user content, a digital free speech case with implications in ...

The Supreme Court punted on cases challenging Texas and Florida laws that regulate social media platforms’ content moderation practices. The case raised questions of whether Facebook, X/Twitter, ...

Two state laws that could upend the way social media companies handle content moderation are still in limbo after a Supreme Court ruling sent the challenges back to lower courts, vacating previous ...

California will no longer enforce key provisions of a law requiring social media companies to disclose details about their content moderation practices after settling a lawsuit with Elon Musk’s X Corp ...

I’ve been trying to stay off social media these past few days—as much as I can as a journalist. On Thursday, a video popped ...

Social media platforms commonly use artificial intelligence for content moderation, with the AI software itself relying on algorithms to screen content posted by social media users. Ultimately, the AI ...

Major social media platforms including Meta, YouTube, Reddit and Bluesky announce content moderation policies for Charlie Kirk shooting videos and posts. Platforms removing graphic content while maint ...

Social media platforms are removing some graphic videos and implementing warnings and age restrictions on other videos of the ...