Scientific research has never produced more information than it does today. Across nearly every discipline, researchers face ...
Hosted on MSN
An AI tool spots copied peer reviews in academic journals — exposing a fraud pipeline nobody knew existed
When Adam Day built a method to compare the language in peer-review reports across scientific journals, he expected to find the occasional lazy reviewer recycling old comments. What he found instead ...
QED, an AI assistant tool, evaluates the originality and validity of bioRxiv preprints, assigning them QED Scores.
To date, the main role of AI in scientific research has been to assist with narrow tasks such as discovering chemical structures, analyzing data or predicting protein shapes. But now, the technology ...
According to a recent reader poll, a surprisingly vast number of respondents trust AI tools, like NotebookLM, for their ...
AI is now helping produce research-level mathematics, but experts say verifying proofs not generating them is becoming the ...
For Oded Rechavi, a molecular biologist at Tel Aviv University, academia is an anomaly in the universe in that it can provide opportunities for people to pursue creative science and chase scientific ...
How much of the scientific literature is generated by AI? The first studies of the size of the AI footprint in scientific journals, preprint repositories and peer-review reports give a spread of ...
Used thoughtfully and transparently, generative AI may support, but must not replace, human judgment, expertise, and critical thinking in peer review. With this editorial, we would like to draw the ...
Moving forward requires coordinated technical, policy, and educational responses. An outright ban on AI in peer review, as is ...
The Leiden Declaration has a vision for mathematics that embraces AI tools, but where human values play a guiding role ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results