President Murmu has asked if in the absence of a constitutionally prescribed timeline and the manner of exercise of powers by the Governor and the President, can timelines be imposed.

The Supreme Court on Tuesday (July 29) heard the suo motu case "In Re : Summoning Advocates Who Give Legal Opinion or ...

A 52-year-old Indore school teacher suffering from osteogenesis imperfecta seeks President's approval for euthanasia, ...

In 2022, a popular music label filed a copyright infringement case against Ilaiyaraaja Music in the Bombay High Court, ...

Political parties should "act as NGOs (non-governmental organisations) at this time", the Supreme Court said Tuesday morning ...

The Indian real estate sector, a cornerstone of employment and economic activity, now finds itself grappling not only with ...

The top court did not stay the EC's electoral roll revision exercise. The poll body will publish the draft voter list on ...

A five-judge constitution bench headed by Chief Justice of India B R Gavai will first hear the parties on the question of ...

The Supreme Court on Tuesday said it will hear the Attorney General for India (AG) and the Solicitor General (SG) on August ...

The Supreme Court on Tuesday fixed a time schedule for hearing the Presidential Reference raising constitutional issues on whether timelines could be imposed for dealing with bills passed by assembly, ...

On petitioners' apprehension that persons omitted from Draft List after its publication on August 1, Supreme Court said, “We ...

A five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice BR Gavai asked the Centre and states to file their written submissions by August ...